This is one of our storm ravaged trees. Branches are broken, but new leaves are sprouting up like today was spring and not fall.
I’m not sure in what form the recovery will take, but at least nature is doing her work. All nature really wants is stasis. One way or another, this tree will be dealt with.
Okay. Enough of that.
Let’s talk about technological dependence. Let’s talk about Monday. Let’s talk about Facebook and all it’s secondary companies. They crashed. There was a DNS problem.
Facebook executives lie about everything. Here’s one now. They claimed service was down for five hours. Oh really?
I was looking for a post so I went directly to Facebook at 7:30am. It was down, at least for any new posting. You could still read whatever was posted before the system came down. You couldn’t reply.
I didn’t have service until around 5pm. I don’t know about you, but I think that’s 9 1/2 hours. Of course, that’s in New Orleans where time moves at a different pace. They say that we are 50 years behind. So, there’s that.
The New York Times published a story about what this really means. Facebook claims a membership of 2.6 billion users. Most just use it like many of us do. Mostly we talk amongst ourselves.
However, about half of that total use it to conduct business, to communicate within companies, to sell stuff, to publish newspapers and — in some countries — it is the prime method of communication.
That’s all great. But, in another story, the Times says that Facebook is weaker than we think and that it is already showing cracks.
There are those who talk about regulatory measures. That’s good. It’s a good idea. Let’s take it a few steps further.
What if Facebook is turned into a utility like electric companies and phone companies? What if the entire internet is declared a utility?
I know, I know. That could take the freedom of the internet away.
That’s been done about a decade ago.
There are only three — or four — big players; Amazon, Facebook, Google and some people say Apple.
There’s no privacy. I could post something on Instagram and see ads for something related on Google. That implies there is no freedom.
It seems simple enough to me. It could be done. It won’t be.
his picture needed something a little different. At least, I think it did.
I made it monochrome. It seemed a little bleaker that way.
It still wasn’t done. I tinkered. I added extra bokeh using OnOne.
I messed around with the basic color because I thought I made it too bleak.
So, this is the finished picture.
Let’s jump back to the other side for a minute. I realized I wasn’t done with it yet.
I concluded that any kind of regulation or reclassification of the internet and its most dominant sites wouldn’t happen.
It’s not because of a lack of political will. There may be. Or, not. I don’t know.
The real issue is that the people conducting hearings — mostly the Senate — have no clue what to ask or how to follow up because they don’t understand the digital world at all.
You’d think that after the last two decades of digital growth they’d take some time to get familiar with these things.
They are busy doing something else; obstructing everything, trying to tear down the good things about government and taking money from certain rich players. You know, bribes. There I said it.
The very least they could do is ask their younger staffers to explain the questions they are about to ask on the floor or in committee so they wouldn’t look like idiots.
But — once again — noooo.