Colorful, Laskowitzpictures.com, Photographs, Photography, Pictures, Ray Laskowitz
Comments 13

Flower Face


One more flowery portrait.

And, one more.

This will be about it, for making experimental portraits. For now. I’m not giving up. Nor, am I abandoning the project. But, this work is fairly time-consuming. Stuff is piling up. Other kinds of pictures. Other kinds of projects. My half built new website. My never-ending archiving project. Other projects that are waiting in the wings.

Which brings me back to my never-ending archiving project. Again. And, again. And, again.

I’m at a crossroads. The one over which I continually trip. The overarching question.

What to keep of my digital archives?  The problem is really a good one. Kind of. I’ve always followed best practices when it comes to archiving my work. Without going into too much detail, that means I never delete images from anywhere. Good, bad, completely messed up. They all stay in my archives. In fact, in one form or another, they always stay there at least twice.

So.

What do I throw away as I build my final archives? Do I keep one set of RAW files, the working images and the final images? Do I keep everything? Do I keep only the working and final images?

Old school photographers like me usually say to keep everything because you’ll never know when you might need an odd frame or two. We talk about the Monica Lewinsky – Bill Clinton relationship, when one photographer “happened” to remember that he might have taken a picture of them together at some speech, almost by accident. It took a huge amount of manpower to locate the image which sold for editorial rates. If have to wonder if the image sale even paid for the cost of research.

That said, it costs money to actually keep and maintain large archives. Either you buy hard drive space or cloud space. Even with good free unlimited file storage using some reputable company like Google or Amazon, storage is mostly compressed and limited to jpegs. Most of the pictures that I’ve been showing you that I located through Google Photos have been compressed. That’s fine if all you are doing is posting pictures online. But, I make large photographic prints. Most of my professional work is used in printed material. My archives must be able to store large photo files saved in the Tiff format. With that I can do whatever I need to do.

I’d love your suggestions, thoughts and ideas. Sometimes, a person (me) just needs a kind of permission to move forward.

Do keep in mind that I am not talking about a few pictures. I am talking about some 50 terabytes of photographs.

And then.

There are about 30 years worth of black and white negatives. Don’t get me started. They are stored properly in groups of 5 or 6 images to a strip. Some are stored in glassine sleeves, others in plastic pages. Once they are culled to a manageable amount of negatives, they have to be scanned and a digital master file made. Talk about time-consuming. Even though my negatives are in fine shape because that old plastic lasts forever as opposed to bits of digital data which need to be reviewed and renewed every couple of years, they still have a little dust, some scratches and so on. Each image needs to be inspected and retouched before the master digital file is made.

I told you. Don’t get me started.

This picture. Well, the base image of the woman smiling isn’t 40 years old this time. It’s two years old. The flowers and other layers are a few weeks old. Sometimes this layering process comes together fairly quickly. With “quickly” being a relative term. This particular image took bits and pieces of two days to show itself in this final form. Have fun if you want to try.

 

Advertisements

13 Comments

  1. I feel your pain. I’m considering adding “priority” rating approach for my Lightroom catalog. I can create a single high, med, low category, or multiple rating categories (e.g. possibility of use in a composite, or degree of visual impact, stock phot candidate, whatever, etc). Each category gets a number associated with rating (e.g. Low =1, Med = 3). Multiply multiple category values to get an overall priority value range.

    Afterwards you pick a separate backup approach for each level in your priority range. For example, low priority, you filter your catalog for low and then batch export to jpg, then delete originals. For high priority rated photos, you use the same catalog filter approach to back up locally and online. The downside is the investment of time to “tag” your images. Hope that gives you some ideas.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I wish. 🙂

      40 plus years of shooting, when I worked until I made “the picture” or “the story.” What do you do with all those out takes.? And, since nothing digital is permanent — unlike film — how many times do you back up even the “keepers?” And, how often do you check those files to make sure they aren’t corrupting? And, what’s the next technology? I’m a big fan of cloud storage, but most only accept jpegs. Some clouds compress that. I could store everything on Amazon as tiffs, but that is very expensive and the real way in which they earn their money.

      What I really need is another big hurricane. Katrina culled my slide files out in just a few hours. HA!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s